![]() ![]() All entries must be received by giveaway end date. ![]() Factory warranties may apply in some cases. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (when required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Deployed military should use stateside address. Mail-in entries accepted send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, GOM January 2023, P.O. Normally I’m the first guy to piss and moan about tiny, fixed U-notch-rear/blade-front vintage sighting arrangements like this one, but I’m gonna keep my mouth shut here - good bifocals and a nice group or three will do that! Whatever long-ago Colt craftsman regulated these sights knew what he was doing. was almost on a par with the Winchester 158s. Winchester stuff produced a 6-shot 2.5″ group at 25 yards while the Black Hills Wadcutters crowded 5 shots into a spectacular cluster at just under 1.5″. Plus, they’re “FMJ clean.” Most 4″ guns I’ve used them in generally produce velocities a bit over 900 fps - what I got with the Police Positive Special. What I like about them is they’re “bulk-pack practice” cheap and pretty accurate in most guns. The Remington FMJs? These are pretty much a dupe of the service ball load used by pilots packing (usually) S&W K-Frames like the Victory Model in WWII. I figured the Winchester stuff would be a pretty close approximation of most pre-war “service loads,” while the Black Hills stuff would be a good bet for demonstrating the little Colt’s accuracy potential. If it would’ve been a modern D-Frame, say a later Detective Special, I might have given the high-test stuff a spin. I also wanted to do so at standard-pressure “stress levels.” I use Plus-P stuff frequently but I usually avoid shooting it in small frame guns this old. I wanted to at least make an attempt to stay within the bullet weight parameters of what was in vogue when the gun was made. My ammo menu for checking our Police Positive Special’s range performance was somewhat limited. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |